Mortgage guide
Development Finance as an Alternative to Bridging Loans
For property developers undertaking new-build schemes or major refurbishment projects, development finance provides a robust and purpose-built alternative to bridging loans. While similar in cost and short-term nature, development finance is structured specifically to support the full development lifecycle, including land acquisition and construction costs, making it more suitable for large-scale projects.
Development Finance as an Alternative to Bridging Loans
For property developers undertaking new-build schemes or major refurbishment projects, development finance provides a robust and purpose-built alternative to bridging loans. While similar in cost and short-term nature, development finance is structured specifically to support the full development lifecycle, including land acquisition and construction costs, making it more suitable for large-scale projects.
What is development finance?
Development finance is a specialist loan designed for property development, including ground-up construction and extensive renovations. Unlike standard bridging loans, which are typically used to acquire property and require works to be self-funded, development finance is structured to fund both the purchase of the site and the cost of construction.
Loan to Cost (LTC) and Loan to Gross Development Value (LTGDV)
Development finance is underwritten using two core metrics:
Loan to Cost (LTC)
Lenders may offer up to 90% of total project costs, including land purchase and build costs. This allows developers to minimise their own capital contribution and improve leverage across the scheme.
Loan to Gross Development Value (LTGDV)
Lending is also capped as a percentage of the completed value of the project, typically up to 75% of GDV. This ensures the loan remains proportionate to the end value and provides a clear framework for risk management.
Together, these metrics allow lenders to fund up to 100% of build costs, subject to GDV and overall project viability.
How funding is released
Funds for construction are usually released in staged drawdowns, aligned to the build programme and verified by an independent monitoring surveyor. This ensures funds are deployed efficiently and that progress aligns with the agreed development plan.
Advantages over bridging loans
Designed specifically for development projects
Development finance is structured to support construction activity, whereas bridging loans are primarily acquisition-focused and rarely fund works in full.
Higher leverage and improved capital efficiency
By funding a high proportion of total costs, development finance allows developers to undertake larger or multiple projects without tying up excessive personal capital.
Aligned with development timescales
Terms typically range from 12 to 24 months, offering greater flexibility than standard bridging facilities and aligning more closely with construction timelines.
Clear exit strategy framework
Development finance is commonly exited through sale of the completed units or refinance onto residential, buy-to-let, or commercial mortgages once the scheme is finished and stabilised.
When development finance is preferable to bridging
Development finance is generally the more appropriate option where works are structural or extensive, costs are significant, and the project relies on GDV rather than day-one value. In these cases, it provides a more efficient and scalable funding solution than using a bridge combined with self-funded construction.
Bridging calculator
Related case studies
Frequently asked questions
How does development finance compare to a bridging loan?
Development finance is similar in cost and term to bridging loans but is designed for construction and major refurbishment. It can fund up to 100% of build costs and is assessed against gross development value, making it more suitable for larger projects.
What are the alternatives to bridging loans in the UK?
Alternatives to bridging loans in the UK include buy-to-let mortgages, renovation mortgages, further advances, second charge mortgages, development finance, remortgaging, and unsecured loans. Suitability depends on timing, property condition, loan size, income, and whether long-term or short-term funding is required.
Is remortgaging a good alternative to a bridging loan?
Remortgaging can be a good alternative where there are sufficient equity and time to complete. It provides lower interest rates and long-term funding but is not suitable for urgent transactions or unmortgage able properties.
What should I consider when choosing a bridging loan alternative?
Key considerations include how quickly funds are needed, property condition, total borrowing cost, loan term, affordability, and whether an exit strategy is required. In many cases, alternatives offer lower risk and better value than bridging finance.
Are second charge mortgages a viable alternative to bridging loans?
Yes, second charge mortgages are a common alternative where a borrower has equity but wants to keep their existing mortgage. They offer longer terms, higher loan-to-income flexibility, and lower overall cost than bridging loans.
Talk it through with an adviser
Speak to a Mortgage Lane adviser about your circumstances and the next steps.
Let’s talk property finance
Contact us
Tell us about your plans and a Mortgage Lane adviser will get in touch.
- Call our team
- +44 333 231 8206
- Email us
- enquiries@mortgagelane.com
- +44 7487 829005
- Opening hours
- Monday to Saturday, 8.30am–5.30pm
Closed Sunday
Your enquiry goes to our team, who will get in touch to discuss your next steps.




